[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Publishing Policies::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 5, Issue 2 (May - June 2016) ::
3 JNE 2016, 5(2): 1-7 Back to browse issues page
The Effect of Two Kinds of Feedback ”written” and “oral written” on Formative Assessment on Arterial Blood Gas Interpretation Skills of Nurses in Critical Care Nurses
A Adhami bajgiran , M Esmaeili , Kh Seilany , T Sadeghi
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , esmaeili_m@tums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (6907 Views)

Introduction: In the process of continuing education, nurses are one of the most important audiences in hospitals, which need development of teaching and learning methods to enhance their performance. This research was based on the need for proper training of Intensive Care Units (ICU) nurses for arterial blood gas interpretation skills in the care of critical patients and evaluated the effect of formative assessment with appropriate feedback for development of this skill.

Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study with 90 nurses working at critical care settings of three hospitals. The samples were selected based on the available sampling method and inclusion criteria. Arterial blood gas interpretation skills of nurses were measured before and after the educational intervention. Results were compared using descriptive and inferential statistical methods using the SPSS Inc software (Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc).

Results: The primary mean score was 13.86 ± 3.7 for the oral group, 12.93 ± 2.27 for the written group and 12.43 ± 2.51 for the control group. Also there were no significant differences between the three groups before the intervention (P = 0.157). The mean score after intervention was 20.33 ± 1.58 for the oral group, 18.40 ± 1.84 for the written group and 15.96 ± 1.56 for the control group. The mean scores between groups were significantly different after the intervention (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study showed that using formative assessment and providing proper feedback is effective on learning and using formative assessment, with written and oral feedback improving arterial blood gas interpretation skills. Therefore, it is recommended that formative assessment with written and oral feedback be used in educational programs.

Keywords: Formative Assessment, Continues Education, Feedback, Intensive Care Units, Nurses, Blood Gas Interpretation
Full-Text [PDF 283 kb]   (2350 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Quantitative-Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/06/25 | Accepted: 2016/06/25 | Published: 2016/06/25
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Adhami bajgiran A, Esmaeili M, Seilany K, Sadeghi T. The Effect of Two Kinds of Feedback ”written” and “oral written” on Formative Assessment on Arterial Blood Gas Interpretation Skills of Nurses in Critical Care Nurses. 3 JNE 2016; 5 (2) :1-7
URL: http://jne.ir/article-1-645-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 2 (May - June 2016) Back to browse issues page
نشریه آموزش پرستاری Journal of Nursing Education
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645