[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Publishing Policies::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 4, Issue 1 (Spring 2015) ::
3 JNE 2015, 4(1): 1-7 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of impact of face to face and educational booklet methods on respiratory self efficacy of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease attending to selected hospitals of Shahid Beheshti university of medical sciences in Tehran
M Etemadi Sanandaji , A Ghahri Sarabi , H Bonakdar , A Akbarzade Baghban , H Banaderakhshan , S Ghasemi
, mashsalaetemadi@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (19930 Views)
Introduction: Patient education is an essential strategy in disease control that reduces complications in patient with chronic diseases. Today, most of the education and information presented in health care systems are at a higher level and are not an appropriate method for people to understand. This study aimed to examine the impact of two of the above methods on respiratory self-efficacy among people with COPD. Method: This study is a quasi-experimental clinical trial that performed in 2012 on 75 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease attending Masihe - Daneshvary and Emam Hosien hospitals in Tehran, Iran. We used purposive sampling method and the participants in the study were divided into three random categories (face to face, educational booklet, and control groups). The two groups of subjects were presented with identical content but different training methods. The control group received the routine instruction in the ward. Data analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: The results showed homogeneity at demographic data in three groups of study. Comparison of demographic and mean respiratory self-efficacy in the baseline between three study groups showed no significant difference. But the mean of respiratory self-efficacy in the past revealed a significant difference between face to face educational group and control groups (P<0.001). The test showed no significant difference between educational booklet group and control group (P>0.05). Conclusion: Among people with COPD, face to face educational strategies increased respiratory self-efficacy more than booklet educational method. Consequently, nurses as care providers in patients with COPD can have a valuable role in patient education using face to face education method.
Keywords: COPD, self efficacy, face to face education, educational booklet
Full-Text [PDF 184 kb]   (3671 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Quantitative-Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2015/04/4 | Accepted: 2015/04/20 | Published: 2015/04/20
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Etemadi Sanandaji M, Ghahri Sarabi A, Bonakdar H, Akbarzade Baghban A, Banaderakhshan H, Ghasemi S. Comparison of impact of face to face and educational booklet methods on respiratory self efficacy of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease attending to selected hospitals of Shahid Beheshti university of medical sciences in Tehran. 3 JNE 2015; 4 (1) :1-7
URL: http://jne.ir/article-1-439-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 4, Issue 1 (Spring 2015) Back to browse issues page
نشریه آموزش پرستاری Journal of Nursing Education
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645